Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris O's avatar

I am curious about the correlation between Americans enthusiastic about crewed space exploration and space science fiction and those who travel and enjoy outdoor activities.

If you really want to explore strange new worlds, seek out new life and different civilizations you could just fly to another country or continent for a lot cheaper than going to space or Mars. But I suspect the people who are excited about a moon base wouldn't last that long or enjoy themselves even on a well-supported expedition to the Canadian wilderness or outback Australia or a hut in Antarctica. I suspect that many of the Star Wars/Trek fans who dream of hanging out in bars on other planets with entities speaking 'strange' languages would in fact not personally enjoy a cantina in rural Mexico or a truck stop in some remote part of Southeast Asia.

To anyone who says they would happily go on a one-way or long-term trip to space and abandon Earth to its problems, please be aware that for the cost of a ticket on a rocket ride to "space" you could by a decent sailboat and still have enough money to sail the world for the rest of your life. If you fancy yourself a rugged explorer, maybe try walking/bicycling/driving from your house to Tierra Del Fuego or from Cape Town to Vladivostok instead of eating potatoes in your storage container sized house on Mars until the radiation and perchlorates get you.

Expand full comment
Max Kaehn's avatar

Any space colonization effort would be under incredible pressure to be good at recycling. Any terraforming effort will require superb understanding of biospheres. Anyone serious about space colonization should be more focused on moving Earth's economy toward cradle-to-cradle design and preserving biodiversity than on big rockets.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts